- What is CodeHS?
- Curriculum
- Platform
- Assignments
- Classroom Management
- Grading
- Gradebook
- Progress Tracking
- Lesson Plans
- Offline Handouts
- Problem Guides
- Practice
- Create
- Problem Bank
- Playlist Bank
- Quiz Scores
- Rostering
- Integrations
- Professional Development
- Stories
- Standards
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- D.C.
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- State Standards
- Plans
- Resources
- Districts
- Share
- Contact Us
- Company
Arkansas Programming Year 1: CSPG.Y1.1.1
CodeHS Lessons
Leverage problem-solving strategies to solve problems of level-appropriate complexity. NOTE: Problem-solving strategies that encompass computational thinking include, but are not limited to, abstraction, algorithm development, decomposition, and pattern recognition.
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 3.5 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.16 Debugging Strategies |
| Standard |
| 1.16 Debugging Strategies |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 1.16 Challenge Problems |
| 2.5 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 3.5 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 3.5 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 3.6 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 3.6 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.4 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 6.3 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 7.1 Challenge Problems |
| 12.5 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 3.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 6.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 13.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 4.1 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 3.5 Top Down Design |
| 12.1 Abstraction |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 4.1 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 4.1 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 4.1 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 3.5 Top Down Design |
| 9.1 Abstraction |
| Standard |
| 2.10 Top Down Design |
| 15.3 Abstraction |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 2.10 Top Down Design |
| 2.11 Abstraction |
| 2.21 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 3.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 3.8 Abstraction |
| 3.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 3.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 4.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 4.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 3.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.17 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.15 Debugging Strategies |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 18.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.5 Collaborative Programming |
| 18.1 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 1.16 Debugging Strategies |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 9.1 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 1.16 Debugging Strategies |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 9.1 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 1.16 Debugging Strategies |
| 2.1 Challenge Problems |
| 5.1 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 6.8 Top Down Design |
| 6.9 Abstraction |
| Standard |
| 8.8 Top Down Design |
| 8.9 Abstraction |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 1.15 Debugging Strategies |
| Standard |
| 1.15 Debugging Strategies |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 3.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 3.10 Top Down Design |
| 3.11 Abstraction |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.16 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 3.5 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 5.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 5.16 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 7.5 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 1.15 Debugging Strategies |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 4.5 Collaborative Programming |
| 14.1 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.11 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 1.11 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.8 Abstraction |
| 1.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 1.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 2.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 2.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 3.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 3.8 Abstraction |
| 3.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 3.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 4.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 4.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 1.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| Standard |
| 4.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 4.8 Abstraction |
| 4.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 4.17 Debugging Strategies |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.16 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 3.1 Challenge Problems |
| 5.5 Collaborative Programming |
| Standard |
| 3.5 Top Down Design |
| 9.1 Abstraction |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.14 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.16 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 3.6 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 3.6 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 21.1 Challenge Problems |
| Standard |
| 3.6 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 1.10 Top Down Design |
| Standard |
| 2.6 Top Down Design and Decomposition in Karel |
| 2.8 Abstraction |
| 2.15 More Karel Examples and Testing |
| 2.17 Debugging Strategies |
| 3.1 Collaborative Programming |
| 3.2 Challenge Problems |
- What is CodeHS?
- Curriculum
- Platform
- Assignments
- Classroom Management
- Grading
- Gradebook
- Progress Tracking
- Lesson Plans
- Offline Handouts
- Problem Guides
- Practice
- Create
- Problem Bank
- Playlist Bank
- Quiz Scores
- Rostering
- Integrations
- Professional Development
- Stories
- Standards
- States
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- D.C.
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- State Standards
- Plans
- Resources
- Districts
- Share
- Contact Us
- Company